Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Summary: this page lists:

  • Impacts of changes made to CAST AIP 8.3.26 on Quality Model results post upgrade
  • Other impacts of changes made in CAST AIP 8.3.26

All changes in results related to extensions are now listed in the extension documentation and will not appear in this page.

Impacts of changes made in CAST AIP 8.3.26 on Quality Model results post upgrade


Other impacts of changes made in CAST AIP 8.3.26

Mainframe

Updates to Base_Mainframe.TCCSetup for transaction configuration

The following changes have been implemented which may impact results when re-analyzing an existing application with AIP 8.3.26:

  • IMS Transactions are now automatically considered part of "Standard Entry Point - IMS - Unknown (GS)"
  • CICS Transactions called from Java methods and Java constructors are no longer considered part of "Standard End Point - CICS - Transactions called by Java (GS)"
  • An error has been fixed where the opposite was true in previous releases:
    • IMS FilePrototype objects are now considered part of "Standard End Point - IMS - GSAM - Not delivered"
    • IMS AnalyzedFileobjects are now considered part of "Standard Data Entity - GSAM"

In previous releases of AIP, unresolved queue names lead to the creation of Publisher/Subscriber objects with the  same name Unresovled:MQP2P. As a result, many false links are created skewing results. In CAST AIP 8.3.26, the name of the unresolved object has been changed from Unresolved:MQP2P to UnknownMQ:<COBOL_Parent_PROGRAM> - this identifies the Cobol program name publishing/subscribing to the message and will reduce the number of false links. This may impact results when re-analyzing an existing application with AIP 8.3.26.

Update to ensure JCL SQL Query objects are created correctly

A change has been implemented to ensure that JCL SQL Query objects are created correctly when the DSNTIAUL program is used. This may impact results when re-analyzing an existing application with AIP 8.3.26.

  • No labels