<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CAST Engineering Dashboard - Quality rule - Inconsistency between number of objects with Violation and failed checks on Documentation - V2</title><link>https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/technical-guides/technical-guides-by-cast-aip-component/cast-engineering-dashboard-component-ced/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks/</link><description>Recent content in CAST Engineering Dashboard - Quality rule - Inconsistency between number of objects with Violation and failed checks on Documentation - V2</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/technical-guides/technical-guides-by-cast-aip-component/cast-engineering-dashboard-component-ced/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>CAST Engineering Dashboard - Quality rule - Inconsistencies - With other CAST components - Dashboard views shows more Architecture Violation than Archi Checker view</title><link>https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/technical-guides/technical-guides-by-cast-aip-component/cast-engineering-dashboard-component-ced/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistencies-with-other-cast-components-dashboard-views-shows-more-architecture-violation-than-archi-checker-view/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/technical-guides/technical-guides-by-cast-aip-component/cast-engineering-dashboard-component-ced/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistencies-with-other-cast-components-dashboard-views-shows-more-architecture-violation-than-archi-checker-view/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Observed in CAST AIP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Release&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Yes/No&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;8.3.x&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;&amp;#x2705;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h3 id="description"&gt;Description&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The customer is comparing results from the dashboard. for example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://doc-data.castsoftware.com/TG/attachments/566538896/566538897.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With result with architecture checker. for example:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://doc-data.castsoftware.com/TG/attachments/566538896/566538895.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="validate-customer-expectations"&gt;Validate customer expectations&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number of objects shown in violation in the dashborad is equal to the total number of wrong links in model violation between all the layers **including the &amp;ldquo;Unassigned Layer&amp;rdquo;.**Not only between two particular layers. In the previous example, &amp;ldquo;unassugned layer&amp;rdquo; is not displayed, hence, we cannot compare obtained value.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CAST Engineering Dashboard - Quality rule - Inconsistency between number of objects with Violation and failed checks - Number of objects with violation is higher than failed Checks</title><link>https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/technical-guides/technical-guides-by-cast-aip-component/cast-engineering-dashboard-component-ced/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks-number-of-objects-with-violation-is-higher-than-failed-checks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/technical-guides/technical-guides-by-cast-aip-component/cast-engineering-dashboard-component-ced/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks-number-of-objects-with-violation-is-higher-than-failed-checks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problem Description&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This page provides an answer for customers reporting the following problem.&lt;br&gt;
In the metric page detail for the metric &amp;ldquo;Avoid cyclical calls and inheritances between packages&amp;rdquo;, at application or module level, the failed checks reported in the summary table is smaller than the number of objects listed in the list of very high risky objects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Applicable in CAST Version&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Release&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Yes/No&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;8.3.x&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;&amp;#x2705;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Details&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The difference between the number of failed checks and the total of listed objects comes from the fact that this metric &amp;ldquo;Avoid cyclical calls and inheritances between packages&amp;rdquo; is a &amp;ldquo;multiple output metric&amp;rdquo;. We can see that in CAST-MS (in the AssesmentModel/ Metric :&amp;ldquo;Avoid cyclical calls and inheritances between packages&amp;rdquo; /Documentation/output Tab).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CAST Engineering Dashboard - Quality rule - Inconsistency between number of objects with Violation and failed checks - Number of objects with violation is smaller than failed Checks</title><link>https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/technical-guides/technical-guides-by-cast-aip-component/cast-engineering-dashboard-component-ced/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks-number-of-objects-with-violation-is-smaller-than-failed-checks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/technical-guides/technical-guides-by-cast-aip-component/cast-engineering-dashboard-component-ced/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks/cast-engineering-dashboard-quality-rule-inconsistency-between-number-of-objects-with-violation-and-failed-checks-number-of-objects-with-violation-is-smaller-than-failed-checks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problem Description&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This page will help you to solve the issue when the Number of objects with violation is smaller than the number of failed Check&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://doc-data.castsoftware.com/TG/attachments/566538901/566538900.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Applicable in CAST Version&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Release&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Yes/No&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;8.3.x&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;&amp;#x2705;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Observed on RDBMS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;RDBMS&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Yes/No&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;CSS&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;&amp;#x2705;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h4 id="step-by-step-scenario"&gt;Step by Step scenario&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Run analysis&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Compute snapshot&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Open CED and observe the issue&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Action Plan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perform the below actions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Run the following query on the central schema to get the shared objects  - &lt;a href="https://doc.castsoftware.com/export-v2/tg/sql-queries/sql-queries-cast-central-base/sql-queries-cast-central-base-sql-queries-on-objects/sql-queries-cast-central-base-queries-on-objects-how-to-check-if-objects-are-shared-among-modules/"&gt;SQL Queries - CAST Central Base - Queries on Objects - How to check if objects are shared among modules&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>